Archive for the ‘Ecology’ Category

Earth Day at Eagle Marsh

Earth-day-image

Earth Day is just around the corner and will be celebrated around the world. But how did it all begin and how can you become involved?

Origins

The idea came to Earth Day founder Gaylord Nelson, then a U.S. Senator from Wisconsin, after witnessing the ravages of the 1969 massive oil spill in Santa Barbara, California. Inspired by the student anti-war movement, he realized that if he could infuse that energy with an emerging public consciousness about air and water pollution, it would force environmental protection onto the national political agenda. Senator Nelson announced the idea for a “national teach-in on the environment” to the national media; persuaded Pete McCloskey, a conservation-minded Republican Congressman, to serve as his co-chair; and recruited Denis Hayes as national coordinator. Hayes built a national staff of 85 to promote events across the land.

As a result, on the 22nd of April, 20 million Americans took to the streets, parks, and auditoriums to demonstrate for a healthy, sustainable environment in massive coast-to-coast rallies. Thousands of colleges and universities organized protests against the deterioration of the environment. Groups that had been fighting against oil spills, polluting factories and power plants, raw sewage, toxic dumps, pesticides, freeways, the loss of wilderness, and the extinction of wildlife suddenly realized they shared common values.

Earth Day 1970 achieved a rare political alignment, enlisting support from Republicans and Democrats, rich and poor, city slickers and farmers, tycoons and labor leaders. The first Earth Day led to the creation of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the passage of the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Endangered Species Acts. “It was a gamble,” Gaylord recalled, “but it worked.”

Earth Day at Eagle Marsh

Screen Shot 2013-04-14 at 8.15.53 PMHere in Fort Wayne Indiana, Earth Day will be celebrated at Eagle Marsh (Little Rivers Wetland Project) on Engle Road from 1-5pm. To say that it will take place on “Engle Road” is in fact the truth. After the success of last year’s event, executive director Sean Nolan requested permission to have Engle Road closed between West Jefferson and Smith Road from 9:00am to 9:00pm.

Many area nature groups and businesses will be part of this free event, which will feature numerous fun activities for the whole family. These include volunteer opportunities to plant native milkweed plants at Eagle Marsh , interactive nature education stations along the preserve’s trails, a new nature photography exhibit, face painting, and more.

The Education Stations will provide lots of “hands-on” activities and will include:

  • Building a Better Bug – insect parts and the opportunity to build your own bug
  • Bee a Pollinator – pollination and the life cycle of a bee
  • Why Wetlands – three experiments to demonstrate wetlands clean water
  • Everything Poops in the Marsh – scats and tracks (hosted by yours truly)
  • Whoo Eats That – what owls eat
  • Salamanders – environmental barometers
  • Frogs and Toads of Eagle Marsh – a hopping good time guaranteed
  • Life Cycle of a Leopard Frog – actually build the four stages
  • Pond Dipping – swimmers, wigglers and things that go hop
  • Bird Observation Station – spot birds and make your own binoculars
  • Coloring with AEP – sponsors for the educational stations

A Earth Day 5K Walk presented by OmniSource will begin at 2:00 pm on April 21 during Earth Day Fort Wayne. Register now at www.firstgiving.com/lrwp/EarthDayWalk ($20 for adults, $10 for ages 7-17) to help us raise funds for LRWP’s important work of wetland restoration and nature education, including the care of Eagle Marsh and other LRWP preserves.

Visit www.Facebook.com/EarthDayFortWayne for details.

 

 

 

 

“A Thousand Questions”

A Thousand Questions

A Thousand Questions

 

Produced by Dave Schwarz, Greg & Corinne Ferguson and starring “spoken-word” poet Sharon Irving this short film focuses attention on the universe as it was created in juxtaposition with what is being faced in the world today.

While not intended to be in any way scientific, it does raise meaningful questions about the role mankind has to play in the disintegration of the environment and society. It reminds us once again that the world is not as it should be and that each one of us bears responsibility either through our acts of commission or omission.

(click on the photo to watch the film)

Mining the Moon?

Regan Morris, of BBC America, recently asked the question, “What if you could mine the moon? The article, which appear on the BBC News Website, reminded me once again of the problem we seem to have with taken care of what we already have, and somehow believing that we can just move on to the next big thing.

The attitude of many is expressed in his opening comment, “…there’s a race to exploit new frontiers by mining their minerals.”

Having recently returned from Sierra Leone, West Africa, and having seen the impoverished communities that surround the extensive titanium, bauxite, gold and diamond mines that are among the highest quality and most productive in the world, I was reminded that so much of how we handle our natural resources is precisely as Morris states, “a race to exploit”. Too often it has been done without concern for the human and environmental impact. As one presidential candidate put it during the lead up to the last federal election in the United States, “That’s the price of progress.” In Morris’ articel, NASA scientist Margarita Marinova, suggests, “…we won’t make the same mistakes in space that we’vd made on Earth and the man can’t afford to explore space without tapping the local resources to survive”.

This raises another important question, is space exploration a responsible expenditure and use of our dwindling resources? Some suggest that the colonization of the Moon and Mars is not too far off in the future. Would anyone really want to live there? I’ve seen the Sahara, Death Valley and driven across the Mohave Desert and personally I would not like to live in any of the three, let alone deserts with no atmosphere and wide-ranging temperature changes. It was be easier to colonized the Sahara Desert than it would the moon. Come on!

Nevertheless, Bob Richards, CEO of Silicon Valley-based Moon Express, one of 25 companies seeking to lead the way in tapping the mineral resources of the moon, says, “We’re becoming a multi-world species. That will happen.” My concern is that if we haven’t done an adequate job of stewarding the resources and the well-being of all living things here on our current planet, how can we expect that a number of resource-seeking corporations will lead us in caring for the next?

In the early days, when new frontiers were opened by Europe in what today is known as the Americas, business interests like the Northwest and the Hudson’s Bay company traveled west for one reason, and one reason alone – to exploit the resources of this new land and return them to Old World. In South America, conquistadores did the same, enslaving, exploiting and exterminating the native people so as to carry off the abundant gold they discovered and enrich both themselves and the monarchies that supported their ventures.

Bob Richard alongside a NASA designed mining robot.

Bob Richard alongside a NASA designed mining robot.

Now, I grew up in the 1960s and remember well the excitement of the Apollo missions. Even in Canada, where I lived, we had school assemblies to watch significant stages of the missions and all aspired to become astronauts someday. However, decades of unbridled spending that gained us little more than bragging rights brought down much of what was the NASA space program.

So does more exploration excite me today? I suppose not. One adjustment I appreciate is that it is no longer being funded to the same degree on the taxpayer’s tab and has been left to the for-profit sector to pursue. Yet the question remains, are we simply moving on from one contaminated planet to a new one as we did from the Old World to the New World? And, what are we prepared to do to ensure that those who benefit little to nothing from such ventures, or are even exploited in the process, are somehow cared for given the opportunity to share in the bounty of what God has created?

 

 

 

What Place Does “Ecology” Have at the Home and Garden Show?

earth-moonThis weekend I look forward to working the booth at the Fort Wayne Home and Garden Show for two of my favorite environmental care groups – Little River Wetlands Project and Acres Land Trust. But some may wonder what place these two organizations have at a Home and Garden Show. Was there simply booth space leftover?

The truth is that both, and others like it, ought to be the centerpiece of any home show. The origin of the current term ecology finds it’s place in the late 19th century (originally as oecology): and comes from the  Greek oikos ‘house’ + -logy. So ecology has to do with the study or care of our home.

It’s unfortunate we limit our concept of home to the four walls that surround us or the survey markers that define our property. Home is the place we share together.

While in West Africa last week, I was chatting with local leaders about the concept of community. I think North Americans have a pretty good concept of relationship, but we’re really weak when it comes to living in community. We emphasize ownership, privacy and establishing contractual relationships. We like to know about each other, but we don’t really do life together very well. In essence, we live in isolation from one another in our individual homes and therefore have little understanding of what it means to share in the care of our greater home. The garden, so to speak, in which we live.

Nothing happens in isolation. The water I pollute may not affect me, but it will impact those who live downstream. Likewise, recent announcements by China to restrict future carbon emissions will not simply improve conditions around Beijing, but will ultimately lower carbon emissions around the world. Ecology is a global concept. We can never think of creation care in local terms alone. The entire earth, and universe that surrounds us, is our home – a place we share in community with one another.

 

 

Green Spaces and Human Health

IMG_0460While the United States has recently averted its “Fiscal Cliff” with a last-minute revision of its taxation model, it has yet to deal with the thorny matter of reducing spending if it hopes to make a meaningful dent in its deficit. In the meanwhile, everyone has their own ideas about what should be cut.

However, not all cuts are equal. Some expenses can actually save us money in the long run. This includes health, recreation and ecological concerns.

For example, one of the programs on the chopping block is the National Parks Department. Yet according to John Gardner of the National Park Conservation Association (NPCA), the current cost to taxpayers is just 1/14th of one percent of the federal budget. Not bad when you consider there are 394 National Parks in the United States. Further restricting funding or access to national parks certainly won’t solve our budget problems.

However, there is another side to this issue that requires consideration. If we want to exercise a fiscally responsible approach to the matter, we ought to also consider the fiscal benefits of spaces like National Parks and other green spaces currently on state and municipal lists of items to be cut or curtailed from their budgets. Quite simply, green spaces improve human health, reduce the need to deal with carbon emissions and increase individual productivity.

NASA, on the other hand, receives about 5 times what the National Parks Department does from the federal budget. While NASA has had its wings clipped over the last few years, I still wonder about the benefit of space exploration. I still can’t take a walk on the moon (not that I want to), neither can any of the people who currently access national, state and municipal green spaces on a regular basis.

It’s interesting to read through the Bible and find multiple examples of God moving people to places of solitude in order to restore and refresh them. Elijah was fed by God through a raven at a brook named Cherith in a quiet and lonely place, and Jesus regularly pulled his disciples aside from the crowd of followers so they could be refreshed and regroup in the wilderness. In fact, he himself found the mountains to be a great place to retreat to in order to pray (Luke 4:42, John 6:15).

Mark Kinver, environment reporter for BBC News, comments on the growing evidence linking green spaces to human wellbeing could help strengthen the case for conservation in “Human wellbeing can strengthen case for conservation”.

 

In his article, he refers to the comments by Prof Norris, a co-author of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment, at the British Ecological Society’s recent conference. Norris explained that he explained that he favoured a framework that embraced the “ecosystem services” concept, which places a value on ecosystem functions – such as reducing pollution or cleaning water – based on what the economic cost would be if we degraded an area’s biodiversity. ”We know that these things are linked to our wellbeing, so that means that they can also be linked to our health,” Prof Norris observed.

So what “fat” do we cut from the federal budget and what exactly do we consider to be “fat”? If green spaces are of benefit to you, perhaps you need to let congress know. The NCPA does a great job of lobbying the government on your behalf, as does the Nature Conservancy. Local trail association and land trusts can also use your help. As a trail steward for Acres Land Trust, I know that filling out a visitor card as you depart any one of their more the 50 properties in Indiana, Ohio or Michigan, helps them in applying for grants from private foundations or from federal or state agencies. The same is true of the Little River Wetlands Project in Fort Wayne.

Preserving our green spaces is not a luxury. It’s necessary to sustain life, sanity and our spiritual connection with God.

 

Going Green with a Live Christmas Tree?

I agree. It seems like an oxymoron, but apparently buying a fresh cut Christmas tree is “greener” than an artificial one.

Turns out that, according to the research of St. Joseph’s University (Philadelphia) biology professor Clint Springer, cutting a live Christmas tree each year is more sustainable than using the same artificial tree for six years running.

Springer takes a number of factors (including allergies to tree pollen) into account, but concludes that if only greenhouse gas emissions are considered the series of six individual live trees has a 60% smaller footprint than a single artificial tree.

Which, if my back-of-the-envelope estimates are correct, means that you’d have to use the same tree for fifteen years before it breaks even in terms of carbon footprint.  Maybe some families (you know who you are) are frugal enough to use an artificial tree for fifteen years before replacing it, but I suspect they’re in the minority.

Nevertheless, Springer suggests the following green options if you already own an artificial tree:

  • Consider using LED lights to decorate the house. A typical 50-light strand of C7 bulbs, often used for outdoor lighting, uses approximately 99 percent more energy than an LED strand of the same number of lights.
  • Buy local and sustainably farmed produce for holiday gatherings. This lessens the use of fossil fuels for transportation, cutting down on carbon dioxide emissions, a major contributor to global climate change.
  • Buy organic produce. Though pricey for some families, buying organic produce is an even better choice for party season. Organic food is not farmed with artificial fertilizers, which require a tremendous amount of fossil fuels to produce.
  • Recycle whenever possible. Consider using wrapping paper or boxes made from recycled material and be sure to recycle them once the gift giving is over.

Well, my wife has already set up our artificial tree (which we replaced last year after 10 years of use), so I guess we won’t be buying a real tree for at least another 10 years.

 

 

 

Lausanne Consultation – Creation Care as a Gospel Issue

“Creation Care” is a term that has come into common usage particularly among Christians concerned with environmental issues. Whether holding to “new earth” or “old earth” beliefs, both camps agree that we are held responsible by God to properly steward what he has created, and that his creation speaks of his glory and provision for all living things. As such, the neglect of God’s creation reflects on our attitude toward him and others who rely on the earth for their sustenance and survival.

Beginning on Monday October 29, 2012, sixty two people from more than twenty countries–”a good mix of scientists, theologians and practitioners”–will gather in St. Ann, Jamaica to consider the implications of gospel on creation care. Such discussions and even resolutions have been presented and adopted. However, this conference will be a major milestone in what has been a subject often ignored by the global Christian community.

According the leadership of the movement:

Christians everywhere ought to be, and are, dismayed by the degree to which God’s creation is suffering in our day.  We are beginning to realize that this is not an issue peripheral to the gospel, but is something that strikes at the heart of our faith:

We cannot claim to love God while abusing what belongs to Christ by right of creation, redemption and inheritance. We care for the earth and responsibly use its abundant resources, not according to the rationale of the secular world, but for the Lord’s sake. If Jesus is Lord of all the earth, we cannot separate our relationship to Christ from how we act in relation to the earth. For to proclaim the gospel that says ‘Jesus is Lord’ is to proclaim the gospel that includes the earth, since Christ’s Lordship is over all creation. Creation care is a thus a gospel issue within the Lordship of Christ.  [Cape Town Commitment, Part I Sec. 7 Par. a]

This consultation will explore the implications of “creation care as a gospel issue”:  Scientists will share from various professional and personal perspectives what we know is now happening to God’s creation.  Theologians will help us explore relevant biblical themes.  And creation care practitioners will describe innovative and effective responses to environmental challenges that are already being used around the world.  Together we will explore and plan ways to awaken and mobilize the worldwide church to respond biblically and effectively.

We will meet at the lovely Cardiff Hall Hotel, Runaway Bay, Jamaica from October 29 to November 3 (arrival Monday afternoon; departure Saturday morning).  The program will explore creation care around the three themes of God’s World, God’s Word and God’s People.

The stated outcomes from this consultation are as follows:

1. To come to an understanding of, and agreement on, how creation care is included in the gospel, God’s plan of redemption through Jesus Christ.


2. To lay the groundwork for a global creation care movement of scientists, theologians and practitioners that will foster similar national movements. 


3. To communicate the content of the consultation so that it becomes commonly accepted as part of the modern evangelical world view and understanding of mission.

The Global Consultation on the Gospel and Creation Care is cohosted by Lausanne and the World Evangelical Alliance, and is supported by a variety of organizations including ACTS, A Rocha International, Care of Creation, Tearfund, and World Vision International.

The Increasing Problem of Light Pollution

Map from NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center, which maps light pollution across the world.

Can we ever have too much light? Generally speaking, we prefer to have light available during the night hours in order to protect us from crime, permit us to remain mobile and to enjoy some hours of entertainment before we go to bed. Light is good.

In fact, Jesus often discussed the matter of light versus darkness. Here are just two statements recorded in John’s gospel:

“I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”

“This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.”

However, Jesus wasn’t referring to physical light, but was using light as a metaphor for truth. When we follow truth, we live in the “light”. When we hide our “wickedness” or more away from God, we chose to live in darkness.

In The City Dark, an independent documentary film by Ian Cheney, this growing phenomenon is examined by ecologists, cancer researchers, astrophysicists, philosophers and designers. Concerns include sleep deprivation, the habits of animals and birds, even Boy Scouts living in the Bronx who have never seen the night sky and the myriads of stars in our galaxy.

However, what I appreciate about the documentary are the practical steps he outlines that are already being put to use, or could with very little effort in order to end what is becoming an increasing disruption to the normal patterns of life for all of nature, including mankind.

So it would seem darkness can be a good thing – although wickedness remains what it is.

 

Ancient Flowers on only two Spanish Cliffs, that use Ants to Survive

Borderea chouardii – one of the world’s rarest plants

Although I generally focus attention on the Midwest of the United States, the following story caught my attention when it was referred to me. I lived in Spain for some time in the 1990s and visited the Pyrenees on a number of occasions. Here’s a article from a biologist, Maria Garcia, that has seemingly spent a lot of time observing the fascinating adaptations of a flower found on just two cliffs.

Here is what was written about her by Discovery magazine: 

This story begins with a cliff-hanger. On the Spanish side of the Pyrenees mountains, around 850 metres above sea level, two adjacent cliff faces hold the entire population of Borderea chouardii – one of the world’s rarest plants. It’s a small herb that grows into crevices in the rock. Its leaves are heart-shaped and its flowers green and unassuming. There are around 10,000 individuals here, all growing on a square kilometre of vertical rock.

Now, Maria Garcia form the Spanish National Research Council has discovered the plant’s survival strategy, which involves three different species of ants. Through these multiple partnerships, B.chouardiiquite literally clings to existence.

The plant is a relict, an ancient hanger-on from a time just after the death of the dinosaurs, when the Pyrenees enjoyed a tropical climate. It was discovered in 1952, and Garcia started studying it in 1993 by request of the Regional Government of Aragon, which is responsible for its management. Since then, she has regularly returned to the site by herself, and monitored all the accessible plants. “It’s not easy fieldwork, I can tell you, but exciting and fun,” she says.
Borderea plants are either male or female and not both. They need some way of carrying pollen from male flowers to females. They live high in the mountains, so wind seems like an obvious candidate. But when Garcia placed several sticky microscope slides next to a male flower, none of them picked up any pollen at all. So, not wind.

What about insects? Between 2008 and 2009, Garcia spent 76 hours just watching B.chouardii to see which insects visited its flowers. The majority were ants: Lasius grandis and Lasius cinereus in particular. That seems to fit, for B.chouardii has many of the traits you’d expect of an ant-pollinated flower. Low-growing, nectar-filled flowers that can be reached by a non-flying insect? Check. Small flowers that aren’t attractive to bigger insects? Check

The ants are rare visitors but effective pollinators. Across 17 years of observations, Garcia has found that around 83 percent of the female flowers eventually bear fruit. But the plant then has another problem: How does it disperse its small, yellow seeds? It can sow itself: Borderea grows away from light, and some of the fruits end up headfirst in new crevices. Two-thirds of the seedlings germinate in this way. The two ants that pollinate B.chouardii might also contribute, since the plant has been found growing from their nests.

But the main seed disperser is another species of ant entirely – Pheidole pallidula. Garcia demonstrated this by setting up seed “cafes” – plastic seed-filled vials that were glued to the cliff. Only P.pallidula visited the vials, and dragged the seeds off to nearby crevices. It prefers the seeds of B.chouardii to those of related species, and it eats two thirds of the seeds it collects. The rest are left to germinate.

Garcia’s careful observations suggest that Borderea takes part in a “double mutualism” – partnering up with some ants to both pollinate its flowers and another to disperse its seeds. It’s a risky strategy. Even though three species of ants are involved, Garcia says that the plant is “putting all its stakes on just one kind of mutualist.” If ants disappear, perhaps if the surrounding cliff-sides become unsuitable for them, then B.chouardii would go extinct. “It is difficult to imagine other animals playing the ants’ role,” says Garcia.

But Borderea has another trick to mitigate its risk of extinction: an extraordinary lifespan of up to 300 years! In 17 years of monitoring, Garcia and other scientists have only counted 139 seedlings – just 8 per year. This is a plant that lives life in the slow lane. Its population is small and grows at an infinitesimal rate, but it’s in no rush.

The cliffs it hangs from are inaccessible to grazing animals, sheltered from the excesses of the elements, and constant in their climate.  Few new individuals are born each year, but few survivors die. Several were lost to public works before Garcia came on the scene, but she soon set up a management plan that prevented further losses. One of her colleagues has also started a programme to grow them in 2 new sites. Will she succeed? We cannot say. This story ends with a cliff-hanger.

Reference: Garcia, Espadaler & Olesen. 2012. Extreme Reproduction and Survival of a True Cliffhanger: The Endangered Plant Borderea chouardii (Dioscoreaceae). PLOS ONEhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044657

Looking at the Forest Floor

Burr Oaks acorns are easily recognized by to the “burrs” on their caps.

Fall is an interesting time. Leaves are starting to turn, birds are preparing to head south and nuts are starting to fall from the trees to the delight of busy squirrels, chipmunks and other forest creatures. I have a friend who tells me he can tell whether a person is interested in birds or wildflowers. He says birders are always looking up, while wildflower lovers are always looking down. I suppose I’m a little schizophrenic as I’m looking up, down and side to side. I just love nature.

This past week, however, while I was hiking the Bicentennial Woods, an Acres Land Trust property north of Fort Wayne, I found it interesting to be able to walk the trail without looking up and yet identify a number of trees overhead. The forest floor was covered with acorns of various kinds, black walnuts, hickory and wild cherries scattered all over the place. Now the acorns sometimes required a little further investigation to determine their origin, but the Burr Oak was one that left absolutely no doubt with its burr-edged cap. In Swinney Park, near downtown Fort Wayne, there’s a Burr Oak that is more the 230 years old. That means that it was there during the American Revolution. There are many other oaks in Midwest that are even older than that. I wonder what stories they would tell if trees could speak.

If you’re quick enough, you can collect a few of your favorite acorns before the squirrels scoop them all up. Some oak trees shed they acorns and they can being growing right on top of the ground – but most need to be buried in the soil.  Those that are buried are generally left in the ground by forgetful squirrels. It’s a bit like when we can’t remember where we left the car keys.

There are two kinds of acorns. All white oaks are mature when they fall to the ground and can germinate within the first year. However, most red oaks and some black oaks are considered immature. That means they are not prepared to germinate until the second year. Overwintering is necessary before they can sprout. If you’re interested in planting acorns, you can simply plant the white oak acorns in the ground or in a deep pot that allows room for the tap root. Red oaks acorns can be stored in the refrigerator over the winter and planted after 42 days of near freezing temperatures. However, don’t let them freeze. Storing them in a plastic bag or container in sawdust is recommended.

Well, here are a few quotes regarding oak trees you might enjoy:

How pleasant it is for a father to sit at his child’s board. It is like an aged man reclining under the shadow of an oak which he has planted.
Voltaire

The greatest achievement was at first and for a time a dream. The oak sleeps in the acorn, the bird waits in the egg, and in the highest vision of the soul a waking angel stirs. Dreams are the seedlings of realities.
James Allen

When the oak is felled the whole forest echoes with it fall, but a hundred acorns are sown in silence by an unnoticed breeze.
Thomas Carlyle

But here is my favorite…

Today’s mighty oak is just yesterday’s nut, that held its ground.
David Icke

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 76 other followers